Doan v. Bergeron et al
| Kim Anh Thi Doan |
| Suzanne Bergeron, Judith A Borges, Brian Churchill, Jane/John Doe, Sean Gallagher, Christopher Myers, Thomas M. Hodgson, Terrence Meredith, Victor Petreca, Jocelyn Ramos, Yveline Simon and Deb Vogt |
| 1:2015cv11725 |
| April 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Bristol |
| Indira Talwani |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
207
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLOWING IN PART and DENYING IN PART 167 Department of Homeland Securitys (DHS) Motion to Quash Subpoena & 172 Kim Anh Thi Doans Cross-Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena. See Attached Order(DaSilva, Carolina)
|
|
Filing
205
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered granting 203 Motion for Clarification. 143 Preliminary Injunction is VACATED. (MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
198
Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered re 144 MOTION to Dismiss Count One of Doan's First Amended Complaint filed by Sean Gallagher. For the reasons set forth in the attached ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S HABEAS PETIT ION, Defendant Sean Gallagher's Motion to Dismiss Count One of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 144 is ALLOWED. Count I of Doan's First Amended Complaint 77 is DISMISSED. (MacDonald, Gail) Modified on 8/18/2016 to correct apostrophes (MacDonald, Gail).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
