Darsch v. Lynch et al
Michael Darsch |
Scott Lynch, John Pronovost, Tracey Duncan, Matthew Green, Hampden District Attorney's Office and Chicopee Police Department |
1:2015cv13466 |
September 29, 2015 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
William G. Young |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: for the failure to comply with the Court's directives to demonstrate good cause why this action should not be dismissed, and for the substantive reasons set forth in the Memorandum an d Order (Docket No. 8), it is hereby Ordered that all federal claims are DISMISSED. The Court declines to take supplemental jurisdiction over any remaining state-law claims (such as the legal malpractice claim), and any state-law claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety. Darsch remains obligated to pay the filing fee as previously assessed.(PSSA, 1) |
Filing 8 Judge William G. Young: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 7) is ALLOWED and the filing fee is assessed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b); Within 42 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall demonstrate good cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for the reasons stated herein; and Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Docket No. 5) is DENIED.(PSSA, 1) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.