The University of Notre Dame (USA) in England v. TJAC Waterloo, LLC et al
Plaintiff: The University of Notre Dame (USA) in England
Defendant: TJAC Waterloo, LLC and ZVI Construction Co., LLC
Case Number: 1:2016cv10150
Filed: February 1, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Allison D. Burroughs
Nature of Suit: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 28:1446
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 132 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Notre Dame's motion to amend, [ECF No. 128 ], is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Notre Dame may amend its complaint to include the proposed amended factual allegations and to add Count IX. Notre Dame may not amend its complaint to seek recognition of the Expert's damages award under Massachusetts law. The attachment will remain as is pending further submissions by the parties. SO ORDERED. (McDonagh, Christina)
July 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 104 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered.For the reasons stated in the Order, the 90 Plaintiff's motion to Amend and Supplement Complaint is GRANTED with respect to adding the new factual allegations and two new counts(currently identified as Counts VI and VIII) that seek recognition of a the foreign judgment under Massachusetts law and an attachment, but DENIED as to adding the declaratory judgmentcount (currently identified as Count VII). (Montes, Mariliz)
April 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 56 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons stated herein: (1) the Determination on Liability is confirmed pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 207; (2) Notre Dame is awarded an attachment as to Defendants property in the amount of $7.2 million, (3) Counts III, IV, and V of the Amended Complaint are dismissed; and (4) the two pending Motions to Strike [13, 51] are denied as moot. The parties are directed to submit a joint status report every 60 days, until the Expert issues a final determination as to damages.(Folan, Karen)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The University of Notre Dame (USA) in England v. TJAC Waterloo, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The University of Notre Dame (USA) in England
Represented By: Robert B Lovett
Represented By: Michael J. McMahon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TJAC Waterloo, LLC
Represented By: Michael E. Brangwynne
Represented By: Richard E. Briansky
Represented By: John W. DiNicola, II
Represented By: Amy B. Hackett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ZVI Construction Co., LLC
Represented By: Richard E. Briansky
Represented By: Amy B. Hackett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?