Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. et al
| Government Employees Insurance Company, GEICO General Insurance and GEICO Indemnity |
| Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C., Gilbert S Weiner, DC, Philip C Barron, DC and Brian T Farrell, DC |
| 1:2016cv10642 |
| April 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Allison D. Burroughs |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. Memorandum and Order on Pending Motions ECF Nos. 51 , 66 , 70 , & 74 .(McDonagh, Christina)
|
|
Filing
38
Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. "...For the reasons stated above, the special motion to dismiss [ECF No. 21] is DENIED, and the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [ECF No. 19] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Specifically, it is granted with respect to Counts II (civil conspiracy), III (money had and received), V (breach of contract), and VI (intentional interference with advantageous business relationships), and denied with respect to Counts I (common law fraud) and IV (Chapter 93A).13 GEICO, however, may move for leave to amend its complaint with respect to the Counts II and VI (civil conspiracy and intentional interference). SO ORDERED. "(Folan, Karen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
