Nunes v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Manuel Nunes
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 1:2016cv11499
Filed: July 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Bristol
Presiding Judge: Leo T. Sorokin
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. For the reasons stated above, the Court DENIES Nunes's Motion to Reverse, Doc. No. 20, and ALLOWS the Defendants Motion to Affirm, Doc. No. 29. re 20 Motion for Order Reversing Decision of Commissioner; 29 Motion for Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner (Simeone, Maria)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nunes v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Manuel Nunes
Represented By: Praven Shenoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?