Ferrara v. Voyport II, LLC et al
| John Ferrara |
| Voyport II, LLC, Voyport Group Holdings, LLC, Allen Preece, Adam Conyers and Jay Rosenblatt |
| 1:2016cv12024 |
| October 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| Leo T. Sorokin |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. 58 Ferrara's Motion for Summary Judgment is ALLOWED as to Counts I against Voyport, but is DENIED on Counts II, III, and IV and V against Voyport. The 58 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED on Counts I, II and III against Conyers. 57 Ferrara's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Voyport, is ALLOWED on all counts as to liability and on Count I, damages are awarded of at least $82,000.Within seven days, Ferrar a shall file a status report proposing a calculation of damages for Counts II, III, IV, and V against Voyport, as well as the basis for asserting individual liability against Conyers on Counts II and III. Within seven days, the parties shall file a joint status report stating: 1) the anticipated duration of trial, 2) whether all parties do or do not consent to trial before Magistrate Judge Dein, and 3) whether all parties request an opportunity for mediation prior to trial. (Status Reports due by 11/5/2018.) (Montes, Mariliz) Modified on 10/29/2018 (Montes, Mariliz).
|
|
Filing
30
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 7 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. This action is DISMISSED in its entirety as to Defendants VGH,Allen Preece, and Jay Rosenblatt. Claim Four (for breach of contract) and Claim Five (for unjust enrichment) are DISMISSED as to Defendant Adam Conyers. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
