Lucien-Calixte v. David et al
| Sandra Lucien-Calixte |
| Neil David and City of Stoughton |
| 1:2017cv11312 |
| July 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Norfolk |
| Nathaniel M. Gorton |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, defendants motion to dismiss (Docket No. 38) is,a. with respect to the claims against the Town and the claim against Officer David for false arrest in Coun t I, ALLOWED, but with respect to the claim against Officer David for malicious prosecution in Count I, DENIED;b. with respect to Count II, ALLOWED;c. with respect the claim against the Town in Count III, ALLOWED, but with respect to the claim against Officer David in Count III, DENIED;d. with respect to Count IV, DENIED.So ordered. (Vieira, Leonardo)
|
|
Filing
30
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER.For the foregoing reasons, the motion of defendants Neal David and the Town of Stoughton for judgment on the pleadings (Docket No. 18 ) is ALLOWED. Count IV is, with respect to the Town of Stoughton, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff is permitted to file an amended complaint, if any, on or before Wednesday, August 22, 2018.So ordered. (Franklin, Yvonne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
