Mitchell v. Silva
Markeese Mitchell |
Steven Silva |
1:2017cv11792 |
September 19, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
Richard G. Stearns |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered adopting Report and Recommendations re 41 Report and Recommendations. Markeese Mitchell's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. (mkz) |
Filing 40 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. The Report and Recommendations 39 is ADOPTED, and Mitchell's 29 Motion for a Stay is DENIED. (Pacho, Arnold) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mitchell v. Silva | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Markeese Mitchell | |
Represented By: | Cathryn A. Neaves |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Steven Silva | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.