Mitchell v. Silva
Petitioner: Markeese Mitchell
Respondent: Steven Silva
Case Number: 1:2017cv11792
Filed: September 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Middlesex
Presiding Judge: Richard G. Stearns
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 43 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered adopting Report and Recommendations re 41 Report and Recommendations. Markeese Mitchell's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. (mkz)
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. The Report and Recommendations 39 is ADOPTED, and Mitchell's 29 Motion for a Stay is DENIED. (Pacho, Arnold)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mitchell v. Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Markeese Mitchell
Represented By: Cathryn A. Neaves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?