Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution v. ATS Specialized, Inc. et al
||Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
||ATS Specialized, Inc., Sam Broughton Wright, Jr., Ridgeway International USA, Inc., Guy Tombs Limited, Australian National Maritime Museum, Service Tire Truck Center, Inc. and TravelCenters of America
||November 21, 2017
||US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
||Jennifer C. Boal
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 14, 2020
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Joint motion of defendants to amend scheduling order (Docket No. 301 ) is ALLOWED. So ordered. (Vieira, Leonardo)
|March 24, 2020
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the forgoing reasons, the R&R (Docket No. 238 ) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED with the caveat that the Museums indemnityclaim is dismissed without prejudice.So ordered.(Vieira, Leonardo)
|March 20, 2019
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 20 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by ATS Specialized, Inc., 22 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Sam Broughton Wri ght, Jr., 32 Motion to Dismiss filed by Guy Tombs Limited, 27 Motion to Dismiss filed by Ridgeway International USA, Inc., 50 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Australian National Maritime Museum. Action on motion: accepting and adopting in part and rejecting and modifying in part 91 Report and Recommendations. (Attachments: # 1 Report and Recommendations)(Lima, Christine)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?