Dias v. Berryhill

Dias v. Berryhill

Plaintiff:	Annie Dias
Defendant:	Nancy A. Berryhill
Case Number:	1:2018cv10280
Filed:	February 13, 2018
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Bristol
Presiding Judge:	Allison D. Burroughs
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 25, 2019	Filing 32 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. "...Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Cabell's Report and Recommendation is adopted to the extent it was not objected to. Nothing in the foregoing opinion should be interpreted a s an evaluation of the merits of Dias' substantive claim of disability. It is entirely possible that, on remand, the ALJ and Council will once again determine that she has failed to demonstrate that she is entitled to disability benefits. Still, at this stage in the proceeding, because the ALJ did not address certain portions of evidence that support Dias' claim for disability, the Court cannot determine whether the ALJ appropriately weighed and considered that evidence. The Court GRAN TS Lopez's motion for an order reversing the Commissioner, DENIES the Commissioner's motion to affirm, and REMANDS the case to the Commission pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further finding and/or proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Cabell's recommendations."(Folan, Karen)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 25, 2019

Filing 32 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. "...Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Cabell's Report and Recommendation is adopted to the extent it was not objected to. Nothing in the foregoing opinion should be interpreted a s an evaluation of the merits of Dias' substantive claim of disability. It is entirely possible that, on remand, the ALJ and Council will once again determine that she has failed to demonstrate that she is entitled to disability benefits. Still, at this stage in the proceeding, because the ALJ did not address certain portions of evidence that support Dias' claim for disability, the Court cannot determine whether the ALJ appropriately weighed and considered that evidence. The Court GRAN TS Lopez's motion for an order reversing the Commissioner, DENIES the Commissioner's motion to affirm, and REMANDS the case to the Commission pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further finding and/or proceedings consistent with Magistrate Judge Cabell's recommendations."(Folan, Karen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dias v. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annie Dias
Represented By:	Elizabeth A. Valentine
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?