Donohue et al v. City of Methuen, Massachusetts et al
Danielle Donohue and Lincolnshouse, LLC |
City of Methuen and John P Gibney |
1:2018cv10713 |
April 13, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Middlesex |
Leo T. Sorokin |
Housing/Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 46) entered. For the foregoing reasons, plaintiffs' motion for leave to file a second amended complaint, Doc. No. 46, is DENIED. re 46 Motion to Amend (Simeone, Maria) |
Filing 37 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered re: 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits and a likelihood of irreparable harm if the injunction is wit hheld. They have also demonstrated that the balance of hardships and the public interest favors the issuance of an injunction. Accordingly, the Court preliminarily ENJOINS the defendants from taking further actions to enforce health or safety laws, i ncluding the state Building Code, against the property at 10 Quincy Street, Methuen, in a way that would not apply to a single-family home with the same number of occupants.The parties shall file a joint status report stating each partys proposal for the schedule for the remainder of this litigation by December 7, 2018. (Garvin, Brendan) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.