Brodbeck v. Massachusetts Department of Correction
Plaintiff: Jennifer A Brodbeck
Defendant: Massachusetts Department of Correction
Case Number: 1:2018cv10855
Filed: May 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Barnstable
Presiding Judge: Denise J. Casper
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1218
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 83 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - The Court ALLOWS DOC's motion for summary judgment, D. 73, and DENIES Brodbeck's and DOC's motions to strike, D. 78; D. 79. (Hourihan, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brodbeck v. Massachusetts Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Massachusetts Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer A Brodbeck
Represented By: Ilir Kavaja
Represented By: Paul L. Nevins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?