Sosa v. Massachusettes Department of Correction et al
| Che Blake Sosa |
| Harold Wilkes, Thomas Groblewski, Massachusettes Department of Correction, Michael Rodrigues, Massachusetts Partership for Correctional HelathCare, Inc, Carol L Lawton, James Saba, Luis Spencer, Carol Higgins O'Brien, Denise nee McDonough Vega, Stephanie Y. Collins and Lisa Mitchell |
| 1:2018cv12223 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary)
|
|
Filing 4
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Castilla, Francis)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Che Blake Sosa. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Castilla, Francis)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Che Blake Sosa. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Castilla, Francis)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Che Blake Sosa. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
