Lima v. Lyons et al
| Moises Enrique Lima |
| Acting Atty. General Matthew G Whitaker, Superintendent Antone Moniz, Sherriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr., Secretary Kristjen M. Nielsen and Mr. Todd Lyons |
| 1:2019cv10400 |
| March 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Mark L Wolf |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Notice of Supplemental Authorities re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Piemonte, Eve) |
| Filing 8 PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM by Moises Enrique Lima. (Attachments: #1 Addendum)(Rubin, Jeffrey) Modified on 4/8/2019 to seal Exhibit A, as it contains personal identifier information (DOB) (Montes, Mariliz). |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM in Support re #6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Todd Lyons, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr, Antone Moniz, Kristjen M. Nielsen, Matthew G Whitaker. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Piemonte, Eve) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Todd Lyons, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr, Antone Moniz, Kristjen M. Nielsen, Matthew G Whitaker.(Piemonte, Eve) |
| Filing 5 JOINT STATEMENT of counsel . (Piemonte, Eve) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eve A. Piemonte on behalf of Todd Lyons, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr, Antone Moniz, Kristjen M. Nielsen, Matthew G Whitaker (Piemonte, Eve) |
| Filing 3 Judge Mark L. Wolf: "...[I]t is hereby ORDERED that: 1. The Clerk of this Court shall serve forthwith a copy of the petition (Docket No. 1) upon respondents and the United States Attorney for the District of Massachusetts. 2. The parties, including the United States, shall confer and, by March 14, 2019, report, jointly if possible, but separately if necessary: (a) whether they have reached an agreement to resolve this case; and, if not, (b) whether they request more time to continue their discussions and/or for the briefing required in paragraph 3 of this Order. 3. If the parties have not reached an agreement to resolve the case, respondents shall, by March 21, 2019, respond to the petition. See 28 U.S.C. 2243. Enrique Lima shall file any reply by March 29, 2019. 4. In order to preserve the court's jurisdiction, to provide the parties an opportunity to attempt to resolve this case and, if necessary, to brief the issues properly, petitioner shall not be moved outside the District of Massachusetts, temporarily or permanently, during the pendency of this case. See 28 U.S.C. 1651(a) ("[A]11 courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law."). This requirement may be reconsidered by the court sua sponte or upon motion by either party." ORDER entered. (Bono, Christine) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Mark L. Wolf assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 First PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-7566448 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Moises Enrique Lima. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Addendum)(Rubin, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
