Quintanilla v. Superintendent , NCCI, Gardner
| Jorge Quintanilla |
| Superintendent, NCCI, Gardner |
| 1:2019cv11052 |
| May 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: BRIEFING ORDER entered re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254), filed by Jorge Quintanilla (Lima, Christine) |
| Filing 10 STATEMENT OF COUNSEL Regarding Victims by Superintendent, NCCI, Gardner. (Reardon, Susanne) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE/ANSWER to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254), by Superintendent, NCCI, Gardner. (Reardon, Susanne) |
| Filing 8 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered ALLOWING #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/11/19 to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/11/19 to File Answer re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254), by Superintendent, NCCI, Gardner.(Reardon, Susanne) |
| Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OF LAW by Jorge Quintanilla. (Masferrer, Eduardo) |
| Filing 5 Copy re #4 Service Order - 2254 Petition, mailed to Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and Respondent on 05/07/2019. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. SERVICE ORDER re 2254 Petition. Order entered pursuant to R.4 of the Rules governing Section 2254 cases for service on respondents. Answer/responsive pleading due w/in 21 days of receipt of this order. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2
General Order 09-1, dated January 6, 2009 regarding the E-Government Act and Personal Identifiers entered. (Vieira, Leonardo)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-7671509 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Jorge Quintanilla. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Procedural History Memorandum, #3 Exhibit Decision and Order of Defendant' Motion for New Trial, #4 Exhibit Appeals Court Decision on Defendant's Appeal and Motion for New trial)(Masferrer, Eduardo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Quintanilla v. Superintendent , NCCI, Gardner | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jorge Quintanilla | |
| Represented By: | Eduardo A. Masferrer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Superintendent, NCCI, Gardner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
