Falade v. San Miguel
| Marlene Falade |
| Valentin San Miguel |
| 1:2019cv11336 |
| June 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $400.00, receipt number 1BST075659 for #1 Complaint, 4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. Plaintiff Marlene Falades Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees of Costs (ECF No. 2) is hereby DENIED without prejudice. In her application, Falade identifies that she receives disability or workers compensation payments, but fails to identify the type and amounts of such payments. Additionally, Falade identifies categories of expenses for rent, utilities, and phone, but fails to provide the monthly amounts of those expenses. She also does not identify the automobile that she claims to own in the complaint in this action as an asset. On this incomplete record, the Court cannot determine whether Falade is eligible to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U..C. 1915(a). Accordingly, it is FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Falade wishes to proceed she shall by July 31, 2019 either (1) pay the $400 filing and administrative fee; or (2) file a renewed and complete motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk is directed to provide a Form AO 240 to Falade which she may use for purposes of a renewed motion. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. [Copy of NEF of this Order and Form AO 240 mailed on 7/3/2019 to plaintiff @ 23 Leyland Street, Boston, MA 02125.] (PSSA, 3) |
| Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marlene Falade.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Valentin San Miguel, filed by Marlene Falade. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Falade v. San Miguel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Valentin San Miguel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Marlene Falade | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
