Anderson et al v. New Rochelle Carpet, Inc.
Bradley Anderson and Eric Chan |
New Rochelle Carpet, Inc. |
1:2019cv11581 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
F Dennis Saylor |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 STATE COURT Record New Rochelle Carpet, Inc. summons served on 6/27/2019, answer due 7/18/2019.. (Moschella, Matthew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by New Rochelle Carpet, Inc..(Moschella, Matthew) |
Filing 6 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Lara, Miguel) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas P. Gorman on behalf of New Rochelle Carpet, Inc. (Gorman, Thomas) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew C Moschella on behalf of New Rochelle Carpet, Inc. (Moschella, Matthew) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by New Rochelle Carpet, Inc.. (Moschella, Matthew) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by New Rochelle Carpet, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7790120 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form)(Moschella, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.