Bishay v. U.S. Court of Appeals
| Pro Se Party Bahig F. Bishay |
| Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, Maura Healey, U.S Courts of Appeals, Circuit Judge William J. Kayatta, Circuit Judge Juan R. Toruella, U.S. Court of Appeals and Elizabeth A. Kaplan |
| 1:2019cv11731 |
| August 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 USCA Case Number 19-1975 for #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Bahig F. Bishay. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re #12 Notice of Appeal. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 11 Order on Motion for Reconsideration, #9 Order Dismissing Case, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,,,,,, by Bahig F. Bishay NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at #http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at #http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at #http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf. US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 10/15/2019. (Bishay, Bahig) |
| Filing 11 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying #10 Motion for Reconsideration (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Reconsideration re #9 Order Dismissing Case, 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,,,,,, by Bahig F. Bishay.(Bishay, Bahig) |
| Filing 9 Judge William G. Young: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE(Paine, Matthew) (Main Document 9 replaced on 9/17/2019 Do To Typographical Error - Wrong Case Number) (Paine, Matthew). |
| Filing 8 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #3 Motion for leave to electronically file Pro Se. The court grants permission on the condition that the plaintiff satisfies all applicable training and other requirements for pro se litigants as stated in the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures, Page 5. The plaintiff is directed to complete the registration form accessible at https://public.mad.uscourts.gov/ecfreg.html Motion ALLOWED. The allowance of this motion does not extend the time for filing of any notice of appeal, motions or any other paper due to delay in obtaining electronic filing access. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered re #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Plaintiff Bahig Bishay's ("Bishay") motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #2 ) is hereby ALLOWED. Because plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, this action is subject to screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), and is hereby DISMISSED sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This Court is without jurisdiction to review judgments of the First Circuit Court of Appeals. Rather, only the Supreme Court is authorized to do so. See 28 U.S.C. 1254. Here, Bishay essentially disagrees with the First Circuit's March 27, 2019 judgment, dismissing as untimely Bishay's appeal of the district court's November 13, 2017 dismissal with prejudice of the action styled Bishay v. Cornetta et al., Civil Action No. 17-11591-ADB, ECF Nos. 21 and 22. Bishay did not attempt to appeal to the Supreme Court. Even if this Court had jurisdiction, "[t]o the extent that the complaint asserts claims against judicial officers based on [Bishay's] dissatisfaction with the manner in which his cases have been decided, such claims are barred because of the doctrine of judicial immunity." Johnson v. U.S. Judges, No. CIV.A. 14-11273-DPW, 2014 WL 3109962, at *2 (D. Mass. July 7, 2014). And, even if the Court had jurisdiction over the remaining defendants, there are no plausibly pleaded allegations supporting a violation of Bishay's federal rights. The Clerk shall issue a separate order of dismissal. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Reassignment. Judge William G. Young added. Judge Allison D. Burroughs no longer assigned to case. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 5 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. "The Court returns this civil action to the Clerk for reassignment pursuant to Local Rule 40.1(g)(4)."(PSSA 5) |
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Judith G. Dein. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to file electronically Pro Se by Bahig F. Bishay.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bahig F. Bishay.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Bahig F. Bishay. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/9/2019: #2 Exhibit) (Castilla, Francis). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
