Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation v. Trpkovski
Plaintiff: Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation
Defendant: Tommy Trpkovski
Case Number: 1:2019cv11988
Filed: September 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration
Cause of Action: 27:185
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award against Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-7886136 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Arbitration Award, #2 Category Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coughlin, Emily)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation v. Trpkovski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fantastic Sams Franchise Corporation
Represented By: Emily G. Coughlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tommy Trpkovski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?