Hayes v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
| Mark Hayes |
| IXP Corporation and Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority |
| 1:2019cv12042 |
| October 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 First MEMORANDUM in Support re #17 First MOTION to Amend the Complaint filed by Mark Hayes. (Newbill, Lucas) |
| Filing 17 First MOTION to Amend the Complaint by Mark Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 Amend. Compl. Blackline Version (w/out exhibits), #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 Amend. Compl. Clean Version (w/ exhibits)(Newbill, Lucas) |
| Filing 16 First Opposition re #14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Mark Hayes. (Newbill, Lucas) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/21/2019: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6) (Paine, Matthew). |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM in Support re #14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by IXP Corporation. (Loveall, Joshua) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings by IXP Corporation.(Loveall, Joshua) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua M. Loveall on behalf of IXP Corporation (Loveall, Joshua) |
| Filing 12 First Opposition re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Mark Hayes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Newbill, Lucas) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM : Motion Hearing set for 12/10/2019 02:00 PM in Courtroom 18 before Judge William G. Young. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Support re #9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A - E)(Cooke, Marjorie) Modified on 10/22/2019 to Correct Docket Text) (Paine, Matthew). |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint, MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM ( Responses due by 11/4/2019) by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.(Cooke, Marjorie) |
| Filing 8 STATE COURT Record. (Gruenthal, Barbara) |
| Filing 7 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to October 21, 2019 to Answer or Otherwise Respond. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Marjorie S. Cooke on behalf of Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (Cooke, Marjorie) |
| Filing 5 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to October 21, 2019 to File Answer by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority.(Gruenthal, Barbara) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee/payment: $400.00, receipt number 1BST076559 for #1 Notice of Removal (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by mail (Coppola, Katelyn) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority ( Fee Status: Local Government) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Category Form)(Gruenthal, Barbara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
