Brocklesby v. Saul
John W Brocklesby |
SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul |
1:2020cv10113 |
January 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Marianne B Bowler |
Indira Talwani |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Considering #6 Procedural Order, ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2020. (Putnam, Harold) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 3/6/2020 11:45 AM in Courtroom 25 before Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Putnam, Harold) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Molly E. Carter on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (Carter, Molly) |
Filing 7 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler Referred for: Full Pretrial, Dispositive Motions (ptd). (MacDonald, Gail) |
Filing 6 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. Procedural Order re Social Security Action (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Andrew M. Saul. Local Rule 4.1 and instructions for service by the United States Marshals Service attached. USM 285 form may be found at www.usmarshals.gov/process/usm285.pdf and is also available from the Clerk upon request. (Attachments: #1 Local Rule 4.1 and Instructions for Service)(PSSA, 3) |
Filing 4 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue a summons. The plaintiff is responsible for serving the complaint and summons in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 4.1 within 90 days of the date the summons is issued. If so asked by the plaintiff, the United States Marshals Service shall complete service as directed by the plaintiff with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. The plaintiff is responsible for providing the United States Marshals Service all papers for service. (PSSA, 3) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John W Brocklesby.(Levenson, Beth) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul (Fee Status: IFP requested), filed by John W Brocklesby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Levenson, Beth) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brocklesby v. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: John W Brocklesby | |
Represented By: | Beth R. Levenson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.