Lopez v. Moniz
Leonardo Fabio Lopez |
Acting Secretary CHAD F. WOLF, FOD Todd Lyons, Attorney General William P. Barr, Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Superintendent Antone Moniz |
1:2020cv10906 |
May 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Nathaniel M Gorton |
Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. STANDING ORDER on 2241 petitions regarding detention and removal of the Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241), filed by Leonardo Fabio Lopez (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 3 General Order 19-02, dated June 1, 2019 regarding Public Access to Immigration Cases Restricted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(c). (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris) |
Filing 1 Emergency PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2241) Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 0101-8238291 Fee status: Filing Fee paid., filed by Leonardo Fabio Lopez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Pomerleau, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.