McConnon v. Beacon Technical Sales, Inc. et al
| Myles McConnon |
| MaryBeth Carroll, Michael Carroll and Beacon Technical Sales, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv11596 |
| August 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Rya W Zobel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and, COUNTERCLAIM against Myles McConnon by MaryBeth Carroll, Michael Carroll, Beacon Technical Sales, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Samuels, Valerie) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Rya W. Zobel assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Beacon Technical Sales, Inc., MaryBeth Carroll, Michael Carroll ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8390814 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Category Sheet)(Samuels, Valerie) (Main Document 1 replaced on 8/27/2020) (Kelly, Danielle). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/27/2020: #3 Exhibit A) (Kelly, Danielle). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
