Norfolk & Dedham v. Whirlpool Corporation
| Norfolk & Dedham aso Barra and Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Company |
| Whirlpool Corporation |
| 1:2020cv12089 |
| November 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Richard G Stearns |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher L. Stanton on behalf of Norfolk & Dedham Mutual Fire Insurance Company (Stanton, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John F. Rooney on behalf of Whirlpool Corporation (Rooney, John) |
| Filing 9 STATE COURT Record. (Treat, Robert) |
| Filing 8 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Added Kyle W. LeClere. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Pacho, Arnold) |
| Filing 7 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. An Answer having been filed in this products liability case, the court enters the following pretrial schedule.Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) must be completed by 12/30/20. All amendments to the pleadings and/or joinder of additional parties shall be completed by 2/26/21. The court will permit 30 interrogatories, 30 requests for admissions and 30 document requests without leave of court and expects those requests to be filed within 30 days of the initial disclosures. If the parties would like to participate in the court's mediation program, they must notify our docket clerk Arnold Pacho (617-748-9812) by 5/24/21 (it may take several weeks to get a mediation date). All fact discovery must be completed no later than 6/11/21. Plaintiff shall designate its expert(s), if any, and serve Rule 26(a)(2) reports no later than 7/2/21; defendants expert witness(es), if any, will be designated and Rule 26(a)(2) reports filed no later than 7/26/21. Expert discovery must be completed by 8/20/21.Dispositive motions are due by 9/13/21, with Oppositions due 10/4/21; Reply, if any, by leave of court. (Zierk, Marsha) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Whirlpool Corporation. (Treat, Robert) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Kyle W. LeClere Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-8523316 by Whirlpool Corporation.(Treat, Robert) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Whirlpool Corporation. (Treat, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email. (Lara, Miguel) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Whirlpool Corporation ( Filing fee: $ 400, receipt number 0101-8521179 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet)(Treat, Robert) (Main Document 1 replaced and Additional attachment(s) added on 11/23/2020: #3 Exhibit A) (Baker, Casey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
