Liviz et al v. Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
| Ilya Liviz, Jr. and Hon Ilya Liviz |
| Honorable Justice Scott L. Kafker, Honorable Justice Frank M. Gaziano, Horable Justice Elspeth B. Cypher, Honorable Justice Kimberly S. Budd, Honorable Justice Ralph D. Gants, Supreme Judicial Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Honorable Justice David A. Lowy and Honorable Justice Barbara A. Lenk |
| 1:2020mc91220 |
| May 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Nathaniel M Gorton |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. (Danieli, Chris) |
| Filing 4 MOTION Emergency 3771 (d) 3 Motion for Relief and Writ of Mandamus by Ilya Liviz, Ilya Liviz, Jr.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 3 MOTION Emergency 3771 (b)( 1) Motion for Hearing by Ilya Liviz, Ilya Liviz, Jr.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ilya Liviz.(Castilla, Francis) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Ilya Liviz, Jr, Ilya Liviz. (Attachments: #1 cover, #2 Appendix, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
