Scarfone v. Smith
Plaintiff: Julie Renee Scarfone
Defendant: Keely Smith
Case Number: 1:2021cv10608
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Denise J Casper
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 11, 2021 Filing 13 Proposed JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference . (Shortell, Brendan)
June 9, 2021 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Justin P. Tinger on behalf of Julie Renee Scarfone (Tinger, Justin)
May 19, 2021 Filing 11 Judge Denise J. Casper: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #10 Motion to ContinueThis hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. Scheduling Conference set for 6/30/2021 02:45 PM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Denise J. Casper. (Hourihan, Lisa)
May 19, 2021 Filing 10 Assented to MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference to 06/28/2021 by Keely Smith. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Straus, Lindsey)
May 12, 2021 Filing 9 Judge Denise J. Casper: Standing Order Regarding Appearance of Counsel Via Telephone or Videoconference (Hourihan, Lisa)
May 12, 2021 Filing 8 Judge Denise J. Casper: ORDER entered. Standing Order Re: Courtroom Opportunities for Relatively Inexperienced Attorneys(Hourihan, Lisa)
May 12, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Scheduling ConferenceThis hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov. Scheduling Conference set for 6/21/2021 02:45 PM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Denise J. Casper. (Hourihan, Lisa)
May 11, 2021 Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by Keely Smith.(Straus, Lindsey)
April 27, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Keely Smith served on 4/20/2021, answer due 5/11/2021. (Shortell, Brendan)
April 13, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Vieira, Leonardo)
April 13, 2021 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Denise J. Casper assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary)
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Report on Filing or Determination re: Copyright - AO 121. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents - Report on the filing/termination of copyright case (Vieira, Leonardo)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Keely Smith Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8723931 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Julie Renee Scarfone. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Sunburst Impressions design, #2 Exhibit B - Copyright Registration No. VA0001906148, #3 Exhibit C - Infringing Sunburst Impressions Pieces, #4 Exhibit D - Copyright Registration No. VA0002235766, #5 Exhibit E - Infringing River Pieces, #6 Exhibit F - Copyright Registration No. VA0002235764, #7 Exhibit G - Infringing Keaton Pieces, #8 Exhibit H - Copyright Registration No. VA0002235762, #9 Exhibit I - Infringing Gwen Pieces, #10 Exhibit J - Copyright Registration No. VAu 1-415-262, #11 Exhibit K - Infringing Nyx Pieces, #12 Exhibit L - Instances of further copying, #13 Civil Cover Sheet, #14 Category Form)(Shortell, Brendan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scarfone v. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Renee Scarfone
Represented By: Brendan M. Shortell
Represented By: Justin P. Tinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Keely Smith
Represented By: Lindsey M. Straus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?