De Armas v. Elsmore et al
Plaintiff: Rafael De Armas
Defendant: Nelson Alves and Joseph L Elsmore
Case Number: 1:2021cv11069
Filed: June 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Patti B Saris
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2021 Filing 9 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Castilla, Francis)
July 14, 2021 Filing 8 Notice to Plaintiff re Service by USMS and Local Rule 4.1 (PSSA, 3)
July 14, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE: re payment of fee (prisoner filer) issued to the Treasurer at MCI Norfolk (PSSA, 3)
July 14, 2021 Filing 6 Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying #2 Motion for TRO; denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. All claims for damages against the defendants in their official capacity are dismissed. The Clerk shall issue summonses for both defendants and De Armas shall serve the summonses, complaint, and this order upon the defendants in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because De Armas is proceeding in forma pauperis, he may elect to have the United States Marshals Service complete service with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States. Service must be completed within 90 days the summonses issue. (PSSA, 3)
June 28, 2021 Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Patti B. Saris assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary)
June 28, 2021 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Rafael De Armas. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Castilla, Francis)
June 28, 2021 Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Rafael De Armas.(Castilla, Francis)
June 28, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Rafael De Armas. (Attachments: #1 (Order to Show Cause)(Castilla, Francis)
June 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Rafael De Armas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 cover letter, #3 Exhibit)(Castilla, Francis)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De Armas v. Elsmore et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nelson Alves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph L Elsmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rafael De Armas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?