Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. AccuTracking, Inc.
Plaintiff: Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC
Defendant: AccuTracking, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2021cv11594
Filed: September 28, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Donald L Cabell
Referring Judge: Nathaniel M Gorton
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 18, 2021 Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal by AccuTracking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wu, Qiuyi)
November 17, 2021 Filing 19 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference Scheduling Conference, to be held by telephone, set for 1/5/2022 02:30 PM in Remote Proceeding : Boston before Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton. (Lima, Christine)
November 16, 2021 Filing 18 ANSWER to Counterclaim by Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC.(Shortell, Brendan)
November 8, 2021 Filing 17 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #13 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Noel F. Chakkalakal. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (McDonagh, Christina)
November 8, 2021 Filing 16 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Ricardo J. Bonilla. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McDonagh, Christina)
November 8, 2021 Filing 15 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #11 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Neil J. McNabnay. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McDonagh, Christina)
November 5, 2021 Filing 14 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Finn, Mary)
November 2, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Noel F. Chakkalakal Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9039536 by AccuTracking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certification of Noel F. Chakkalakal)(Wu, Qiuyi)
November 2, 2021 Filing 12 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Ricardo J. Bonilla Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9039486 by AccuTracking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certification of Ricardo J. Bonilla)(Wu, Qiuyi)
November 2, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Neil J. McNabnay Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9039279 by AccuTracking, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Certification of Neil J. McNabnay)(Wu, Qiuyi)
November 1, 2021 Filing 10 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. . (Shortell, Brendan)
October 29, 2021 Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms shall be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Russo, Noreen)
October 28, 2021 Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by AccuTracking, Inc.. (Wu, Qiuyi)
October 28, 2021 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES and, COUNTERCLAIM against Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC by AccuTracking, Inc..(Wu, Qiuyi)
October 28, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Qiuyi Wu on behalf of AccuTracking, Inc. (Wu, Qiuyi)
September 28, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to AccuTracking, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Dore, Samantha)
September 28, 2021 Filing 4 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris)
September 28, 2021 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Dore, Samantha)
September 28, 2021 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC. (Dore, Samantha)
September 28, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AccuTracking, Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-8980716 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - United States Patent No. 9,261,365, #2 AO 120, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Category Form, # 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Shortell, Brendan) Modified on 9/28/2021 (Dore, Samantha). The Corporate Disclosure Statement was removed and made into it's own entry.

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC v. AccuTracking, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Social Positioning Input Systems, LLC
Represented By: Brendan M. Shortell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AccuTracking, Inc.
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Represented By: Ricardo Bonilla
Represented By: Qiuyi Wu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?