Romecevich v. Armbruster
| Mary Romecevich |
| Mary K. Armbruster |
| 1:2021cv11656 |
| October 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Indira Talwani |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew D. Rush on behalf of Mary K. Armbruster (Rush, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling Hearing: Status conference is canceled. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case RE-Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 8 Refusal to Consent to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge. Refusal Form. (Antonellis, Anthony) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Loren E. Laskoski (Laskoski, Loren) |
| Filing 6 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing.This hearing will be conducted by video conference. Counsel of record will receive a video conference invite at the email registered in CM/ECF. If you have technical or compatibility issues with the technology, please notify the session's courtroom deputy as soon as possible. Status Conference set for 11/23/2021 04:15 PM in Courtroom 24 (Remote only) before Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley in order to inform the court whether the parties consent to proceed before a magistrate judge. The court has not yet received a form indicating whether the parties consent to a magistrate judge. The form is mandatory. If the parties file the form prior to the hearing indicating consent to proceed before a magistrate judge, the parties should also file a proposed scheduling order no later than 3 days prior to the hearing. If the parties file the form prior to the hearing indicating refusal to proceed before a magistrate judge, the hearing will be canceled and the case will be reassigned to a district judge.Access to the hearing will be made available to the media and public. In order to gain access to the hearing, you must sign up at the following address: #https://forms.mad.uscourts.gov/courtlist.html. For questions regarding access to hearings, you may refer to the Court's general orders and public notices available on #www.mad.uscourts.gov or contact media@mad.uscourts.gov.(Vieira, Leonardo) Modified on 11/9/2021 to fix docket text (Vieira, Leonardo). |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Notification forms indicating whether or not a party has consented to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge have not been received in the Clerk's Office. The submission of the form is mandatory. Completed forms shall be filed promptly. Additional forms can be obtained on the Court's web page at http://www.mad.uscourts.gov. (Ferguson, Kerry) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Mary K. Armbruster.(Antonellis, Anthony) |
| Filing 3 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Mary K. Armbruster ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9003427 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Summons, #3 State Court Complaint, #4 Motion to Extend Time, #5 Endorsement on Motion to Extend Time, #6 State Court Docket Information)(Antonellis, Anthony) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/12/2021: #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Category Form) (Warnock, Douglas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Romecevich v. Armbruster | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Mary Romecevich | |
| Represented By: | John R. Bita, III |
| Represented By: | Loren E. Laskoski |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Mary K. Armbruster | |
| Represented By: | Anthony J. Antonellis |
| Represented By: | Matthew D. Rush |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
