Chubb Insurance Company of Canada v. Erickson
Chubb Insurance Company of Canada |
Tod Stuart Erickson |
1:2022cv10679 |
May 4, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
F Dennis Saylor |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Conversion |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 15, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Tod Stuart Erickson answer due 7/15/2022. (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 15, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Tod Stuart Erickson.(Christie, William) |
Filing 8 Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 5, 2022 to File Answer. Tod Stuart Erickson answer due 7/5/2022. (McKillop, Matthew) |
Filing 7 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 5, 2022 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Tod Stuart Erickson.(Christie, William) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by William E. Christie on behalf of Tod Stuart Erickson (Christie, William) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed Tod Stuart Erickson served on 5/12/2022, answer due 6/2/2022. (Loftus, Patrick) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Tod Stuart Erickson. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Chief Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Chubb Insurance Company of Canada identifying Corporate Parent Chubb Limited, Corporate Parent Chubb U.S. Group of Insurance Companies for Chubb Insurance Company of Canada.. (Loftus, Patrick) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tod Stuart Erickson Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9306589 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Chubb Insurance Company of Canada. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Loftus, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Chubb Insurance Company of Canada v. Erickson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Chubb Insurance Company of Canada | |
Represented By: | Patrick J. Loftus, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Tod Stuart Erickson | |
Represented By: | William E. Christie |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.