Brilliant Home Technology, Inc. v. Canal Alarm Devices
Plaintiff: Brilliant Home Technology, Inc.
Defendant: Canal Alarm Devices, Inc. d/b/a Vidlogix.com, 123SecurityProducts.com, and canalalarm.com and Canal Alarm Devices, Inc. doing business as Vidlogix.com doing business as 123SecurityProducts.com doing business as Canalalarm.com
Case Number: 1:2022cv11016
Filed: June 27, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Allison D Burroughs
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 8, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Brilliant Home Technology, Inc. (Brodsky, Jack)
July 13, 2022 Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by Brilliant Home Technology, Inc.. Canal Alarm Devices, Inc. served on 6/29/2022, answer due 7/20/2022. Acknowledgement filed by Brilliant Home Technology, Inc.. (Brodsky, Jack)
July 5, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack S. Brodsky on behalf of Brilliant Home Technology, Inc. (Brodsky, Jack)
June 28, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Canal Alarm Devices, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
June 28, 2022 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary)
June 27, 2022 Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Nickerson, Morgan)
June 27, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Canal Alarm Devices, Inc. d/b/a Vidlogix.com, 123SecurityProducts.com, and canalalarm.com Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9386486 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Brilliant Home Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Nickerson, Morgan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brilliant Home Technology, Inc. v. Canal Alarm Devices
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brilliant Home Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Morgan T. Nickerson
Represented By: Jack S. Brodsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canal Alarm Devices, Inc. d/b/a Vidlogix.com, 123SecurityProducts.com, and canalalarm.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canal Alarm Devices, Inc. doing business as Vidlogix.com doing business as 123SecurityProducts.com doing business as Canalalarm.com
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?