Caven v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
| David Caven |
| Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston |
| 1:2022cv11169 |
| July 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Angel Kelley |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Selina Valdez on behalf of David Caven (Valdez, Selina) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Susan D. Sachs on behalf of David Caven (Sachs, Susan) |
| Filing 6 District Judge Angel Kelley: ELECTRONIC ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Selina Valdez. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at # https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Kelly, Danielle) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY PAYMENT OF FEES by Plaintiff David Caven. Filing fee $ 100, receipt number AMADC-9421274. Payment Type : PRO HAC VICE. (Sachs, Susan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Selina Valdez by David Caven. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit In Support of Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice)(Sachs, Susan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Currie, Haley) |
| Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Angel Kelley assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9419770 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by David Caven. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Sachs, Susan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Caven v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: David Caven | |
| Represented By: | Susan D. Sachs |
| Represented By: | Selina Valdez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
