Collymore v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
Steven D. Collymore |
Commonwealth of Massachusetts and Nashua Street Jail |
1:2022cv11468 |
September 12, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Indira Talwani |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter/request (non-motion) from Steven Collymore. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Steven D. Collymore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Cover Letter)(Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 5 Judge Indira Talwani: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER(PSSA, 5) |
Filing 4 STATEMENT OF CLAIM re #1 Complaint by Steven D. Collymore. (Kelly, Danielle) |
Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Finn, Mary) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Steven D. Collymore. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit inmate statement)(Castilla, Francis) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nashua Street Jail, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, filed by Steven D. Collymore. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet category form, #2 envelope)(Castilla, Francis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.