Boyle v. Boyle
Plaintiff: Mr. Arthur A. Boyle
Defendant: Ms. Cheryl A. Boyle
Case Number: 1:2022cv40151
Filed: December 20, 2022
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Allison D Burroughs
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2023 Filing 9 Judge Allison D. Burroughs: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to 3/8/23 to respond to motion to dismiss. (Folan, Karen)
February 6, 2023 Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to 3/8/2023 to File Response to Motion to Dismiss by Arthur A. Boyle.(Couture, Andrew) (Main Document 8 replaced on 2/7/2023 after justification corrected as the PDF was sideways) (McManus, Caetlin). Modified on 2/7/2023. Filing event corrected to "Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply" and docket text corrected (McManus, Caetlin).
January 23, 2023 Filing 7 Memorandum in Support of #6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Cheryl A. Boyle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14)(Romagna, Gary) Docket text modified to correct filing event and attachment names on 1/23/2023 (McManus, Caetlin).
January 20, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint with Memorandum and Exhibits by Cheryl A. Boyle. (Attachment removed on 1/23/2023 and filed correctly at ECF #7 (McManus, Caetlin))(Romagna, Gary)
December 22, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Cheryl A. Boyle. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Danieli, Chris)
December 22, 2022 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Allison D. Burroughs assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Danieli, Chris)
December 22, 2022 Filing 3 Case transferred in from Central Division (Worcester) on 12/20/2022 Case Number 4:22-cv-40151. (Danieli, Chris)
December 20, 2022 Filing 2 Case transferred to Eastern Division (Boston) (Barrows, Jennifer)
December 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arthur A. Boyle Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9638320 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Arthur A. Boyle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Couture, Andrew)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyle v. Boyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mr. Arthur A. Boyle
Represented By: Andrew J. Couture
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ms. Cheryl A. Boyle
Represented By: Gary F. Romagna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?