Haidaczuk, et al. v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
| James Haidaczuk, Jr. and Melissa Haidaczuk |
| Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. |
| Judge Judith Gail Dein |
| 1:2023cv10294 |
| February 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| William G Young |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 STATE COURT Record. (Suuberg, Margaret) |
| Filing 17 Notice of assignment to ADR Provider. Judge Judith Gail Dein appointed for a mediation date in August 2023.(Simeone, Maria) |
| Filing 16 ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling Hearing. The Court having approved the parties joint proposed case management schedule as the scheduling order and the parties having waived the 16.b conference, the scheduling conference set for 3:00 PM on Thursday, March 2, 2023 is hereby canceled. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 15 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered; ORDER REFERRING CASE to Alternative Dispute Resolution to be held during the month of August 2023.(Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 14 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re #13 Second Joint Statement is so ordered as the case management scheduling order. Ready for Trial on 3/4/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom 18 (In person only) before Judge William G. Young.)(Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 13 Second JOINT SUBMISSION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 with Proposed Pretrial Schedule by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc..(Farrey, Thomas) |
| Filing 12 Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.'s ANSWER to #9 Amended Complaint by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc..(Farrey, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 Judge William G. Young: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re #10 JOINT STATEMENT is rejected as overlong. This case is placed - at the latest - on the March 2024 running trial list. The parties are to resubmit the joint statement. (Paine, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference (with Proposed Pre-Trial Schedule). (Farrey, Thomas) |
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Sunbelt Rentals, Inc., filed by James Haidaczuk, Jr.(Walsh, Stephen) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 3/2/2023 03:00 PM in Courtroom 18 (In person only) before Judge William G. Young. (Gaudet, Jennifer) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc..(Farrey, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 Certified Copy of Notice of Removal Provided to Defense Counsel by Email (Warnock, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge William G. Young assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge M. Page Kelley. (Finn, Mary) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.. (Farrey, Thomas) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Margaret R. Suuberg on behalf of Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. (Suuberg, Margaret) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas B. Farrey, III on behalf of Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. (Farrey, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sunbelt Rentals, Inc. ( Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number AMADC-9704871 Fee Status: Filing Fee paid) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits 1-3 to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet & Category Sheet)(Farrey, Thomas) (Attachment 2 replaced on 2/6/2023 to reflect jury demand) (Warnock, Douglas). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
