Viken Detection Corporation v. Videray Technologies, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: Viken Detection Corporation
Defendant: Paul E. Bradshaw and Videray Technologies, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2024cv11375
Filed: May 24, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: George A OToole
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 9/17/2024 02:00 PM in Courtroom 22 (In person only) before Judge George A. O'Toole Jr.. Please See Attached Standing Order. (Fleming, John)
June 27, 2024 Filing 13 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #12 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Stephen S. Korniczky, Jesse A. Salen, Ryan Cunningham. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at # https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
June 27, 2024 Filing 12 Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Stephen S. Korniczky, Jesse A. Salen, Ryan Cunningham Filing fee: $ 375, receipt number AMADC-10481252 by Paul E. Bradshaw, Videray Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Stephen S. Korniczky, #2 Certificate of Jesse A. Salen, #3 Certificate of Ryan Cunningham)(Kruzer, James)
June 24, 2024 Filing 11 Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered GRANTING #9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to August 5, 2024 to File Answer re #1 Complaint. Paul E. Bradshaw and Videray Technologies, Inc. answers due 8/5/2024. (de Oliveira, Flaviana)
June 18, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by James E. Kruzer on behalf of Paul E. Bradshaw, Videray Technologies, Inc. (Kruzer, James)
June 18, 2024 Filing 9 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to August 5, 2024 to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Paul E. Bradshaw, Videray Technologies, Inc..(Godkin, David)
June 18, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Godkin on behalf of Paul E. Bradshaw, Videray Technologies, Inc. (Godkin, David)
June 4, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Paul E. Bradshaw served on 5/30/2024, answer due 6/20/2024. (Schultz, Christopher)
June 4, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Videray Technologies, Inc. served on 5/30/2024, answer due 6/20/2024. (Schultz, Christopher)
May 24, 2024 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Paul E. Bradshaw, Videray Technologies, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (McManus, Caetlin)
May 24, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher S. Schultz on behalf of Viken Detection Corporation (Schultz, Christopher)
May 24, 2024 Filing 3 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge George A. OToole, Jr assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Jennifer C. Boal. (Horvath, Courtney)
May 24, 2024 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Counsel shall complete and file in PDF format a Report on Filing or Determination Re: Patent or Trademark AO 120. The form can be found on the court's website under Resources/Forms/Local Forms. Counsel will use the event under Other Documents - Report on the filing of patent/trademark case. (McManus, Caetlin)
May 24, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION, Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10433118 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by VIKEN DETECTION CORPORATION,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit U.S. Patent No. 11,940,395, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Category Form)(Schaefer, Lauren)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Viken Detection Corporation v. Videray Technologies, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul E. Bradshaw
Represented By: Stephen S. Korniczky
Represented By: Ryan Cunningham
Represented By: Jesse A. Salen
Represented By: James E. Kruzer
Represented By: David S. Godkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Videray Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Stephen S. Korniczky
Represented By: Ryan Cunningham
Represented By: Jesse A. Salen
Represented By: James E. Kruzer
Represented By: David S. Godkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Viken Detection Corporation
Represented By: Lauren C. Schaefer
Represented By: Christopher S. Schultz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?