NETGEAR, Inc. v. NETGR ROUTER et al
Plaintiff: NETGEAR, Inc.
Defendant: NETGR ROUTER and John Does 1-5
Case Number: 1:2024cv12071
Filed: August 12, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Indira Talwani
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 21, 2024 Filing 6 Judge Indira Talwani: ELECTRONIC ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff NETGEAR, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Serve Third-Party Subpoenas Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference [#4 ] (the "Motion"). NETGEAR has established good cause for the court to grant it leave to serve third-party subpoenas prior to a Rule 26(f) conference. NETGEAR may serve Rule 45 subpoenas upon the third parties explicitly identified in its Motion: GoDaddy.com, LLC; PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com; Namecheap, Inc.; and PayPal, Inc. NETGEAR's Motion is GRANTED as to these third parties. The remainder of NETGEAR's Motion [#4], seeking to serve Rule 45 subpoenas upon as-yet unidentified and undiscovered entities, is DENIED without prejudice. (Kelly, Danielle)
August 19, 2024 Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Counsel, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Nickerson, Morgan)
August 19, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS by NETGEAR, Inc..(Nickerson, Morgan)
August 13, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to John Does 1-5, NETGR ROUTER. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kelly, Danielle)
August 13, 2024 Filing 2 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Indira Talwani assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Paul G. Levenson. (Cowan, Nicole)
August 12, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10551293 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by NETGEAR, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(Nickerson, Morgan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NETGEAR, Inc. v. NETGR ROUTER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NETGEAR, Inc.
Represented By: Morgan T. Nickerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NETGR ROUTER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-5
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?