Securities and Exchange Commission v Armand et al
Securities and Exchange Commission |
Mkay Saitama, Manpreet Singh Kholi, Maxwell Hernandez, mannythehitman, MaxEquation, Ntran, Saitamagurul, Russell Armand and Nam Tran |
1:2024cv12586 |
October 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Other Fraud |
12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Assented to MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Defendant, #2 Exhibit Proposed Judgment)(Burkart, Amy) |
Filing 4 Assented to MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Defendant, #2 Exhibit Proposed Judgment)(Burkart, Amy) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Amy Harman Burkart on behalf of Securities and Exchange Commission (Burkart, Amy) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by Securities and Exchange Commission of Related Criminal Cases (D'Addio, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Fee Status: US Government), filed by Securities and Exchange Commission. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form)(D'Addio, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.