Excelsior Printing Company v. Inman et al
| Excelsior Printing Company |
| Matthew Inman and Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc. |
| 3:2012cv30200 |
| November 20, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Springfield Office |
| Berkshire |
| Michael A. Ponsor |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 33 STIPULATION of Dismissal with prejudice by Excelsior Printing Company. (Hennessey, Christopher) |
| Filing 32 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. ORDER granting defendants request to file answer by 8/16/13. See attached order for details. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 31 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 30 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, Matthew Inman answer due 8/16/2013; Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc. answer due 8/16/2013. ALLOWED, with reluctance. See order. It is time either to wrap up settlement discussion or proceed with the litigation. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 30 Fifth MOTION for Extension of Time to August 16, 2013 to File Answer re 1 Complaint, by Matthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 29 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 28 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. ALLOWED. Extension to 7-3-13, Matthew Inman answer due 7/3/2013. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 28 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 07/03/2013 to File Answer by Matthew Inman.(Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 27 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 25 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or otherwise respond to Ptf's 1 Complaint. ALLOWED. Extension to July 3, 2013. Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc. answer due 7/3/2013. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of Appearance by Nuala E. Droney on behalf of Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc. (Droney, Nuala) |
| Filing 25 Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to 7/3/13 to File Answer by Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc..(Curtin, Jason) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason B. Curtin on behalf of Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc. (Curtin, Jason) |
| Filing 23 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to May 6, 2013 to Answer re 1 Complaint. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 22 AFFIDAVIT in Support re 21 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Response to Complaint. (Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 21 STIPULATION Extending time to file response to complaint by Matthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Balasubramani, Venkat) Modified on 4/16/2013 (Lindsay, Maurice). |
| Filing 20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Excelsior Printing Company. Papyrus-Recycled Greetings, Inc. waiver sent on 3/5/2013, answer due 5/6/2013. (Hennessey, Christopher) |
| Filing 19 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered. re 17 Stipulation to Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Matthew Inman, Matthew Inman answer due 4/12/2013.(Pelegano, Theresa) |
| Filing 18 AFFIDAVIT in Support of Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Matthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 16 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ORDER entered. granting 14 Joint Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond. Defendant Matthew Inman answer due 2/27/13. See the attached order for details. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 15 AFFIDAVIT in Support re 14 Stipulation Extending Time to Respond to Complaint. (Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 14 STIPULATION Extending Time to Respond to Complaint by Matthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Balasubramani, Venkat) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Excelsior Printing Company. Matthew Inman waiver sent on 11/29/2012, answer due 1/28/2013. (Hennessey, Christopher) |
| Filing 12 Judge Michael A. Ponsor: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. ALLOWED. Added Venkat Balasubramani. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must register for electronic filing if the attorney does not already have an ECF account in this district. To register go to the Court website at www.mad.uscourts.gov. Select Case Information, then Electronic Filing (CM/ECF) and go to the CM/ECF Registration Form. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Y. Silverstein on behalf of Matthew Inman (Silverstein, Aaron) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Venkat Balasubramani Filing fee: $ 100, receipt number 0101-4223840 by Matthew Inman. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration in Support of Pro Hac motion)(Saunders, Arpiar) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Arpiar M. Saunders on behalf of Matthew Inman (Saunders, Arpiar) |
| Filing 6 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Alves-Baptista, Antonia) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Filing fee: $ 350, receipt number 0101-4210590 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Excelsior Printing Company. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Hennessey, Christopher) (Attachment 1 replaced on 11/21/2012) (Lindsay, Maurice). (Attachment 2 replaced on 11/21/2012) (Lindsay, Maurice). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
