Piquette v. Belchertown Public Schools et al
David Piquette and Debra Piquette |
Belchertown Public Schools and Bureau of Special Education Appeals |
3:2016cv30189 |
December 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Springfield Office |
Hampshire |
Mark G. Mastroianni |
Civil Rights: Education |
20 U.S.C. ยง 1415 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. As follows: For the reasons stated, Defendants Motions for Summary Judgment are hereby ALLOWED and Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby DENIED. This case may nowbe closed. It is So Ordered. See the attached order for complete details. (Lindsay, Maurice) |
Filing 52 Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Regarding Plaintiffs' 25 MOTION to Supplement and 46 MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief - Motion to Supplement the Administrative Record. For the reasons stated, Plai ntiffs' motions to supplement (Dkt. Nos. 25 , 46 ) are DENIED without prejudice to Plaintiffs filing a renewed motion to supplement with a revised affidavit from Debra Piquette addressing Plaintiffs' payments for WMA tuition for the 2016- 2017 school year, responding to the concerns raised by BPS in its opposition. See attached Memo & Order for complete details. (Calderon, Melissa) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.