Perry v. Treseler et al
Plaintiff: Donald L. Perry
Defendant: Daniel Bennett and Paul M. Treseler
Case Number: 3:2018cv30194
Filed: December 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2019 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT in Support of Plaintiff's #6 Summons Returned Executed, #7 Summons Returned Executed. (Lindsay, Maurice)
February 5, 2019 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Paul M. Treseler served on 1/23/2019, answer due 2/13/2019. (Lindsay, Maurice)
February 5, 2019 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed Daniel Bennett served on 1/29/2019, answer due 2/19/2019. (Lindsay, Maurice)
December 21, 2018 Filing 5 Filing fee/payment: $ 400.00, receipt number SPR003917 for #1 Complaint, (Lindsay, Maurice)
December 17, 2018 Filing 4 Remark: Summons Issued sent to Plaintiff via mail along with instructions. (Figueroa, Tamara)
December 17, 2018 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Daniel Bennett, Paul M. Treseler. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Figueroa, Tamara)
December 17, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Finn, Mary)
December 17, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Donald L. Perry. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Sheet, #3 Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A, #5 Exhibit B) (Figueroa, Tamara) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/17/2018: #6 payment) (Figueroa, Tamara).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. Treseler et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald L. Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Bennett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Paul M. Treseler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?