Validity, Inc. v. Profisee Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Validity, Inc.
Defendant: Profisee Group, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2021cv10683
Filed: April 23, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Presiding Judge: Katherine A Robertson
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2021 Filing 9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Validity, Inc.. Profisee Group, Inc. waiver sent on 5/14/2021, answer due 7/13/2021. (Kravitz, Jason)
May 17, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Leslie E. Hartford on behalf of Validity, Inc. (Hartford, Leslie)
April 29, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Validity, Inc.. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Zamorski, Michael)
April 27, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Case Assignment. Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson assigned to case. Plaintiff's counsel, or defendant's counsel if this case was initiated by the filing of a Notice of Removal, are directed to the Notice and Procedures regarding Consent to Proceed before the Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. These documents will be mailed to counsel not receiving notice electronically. Pursuant to General Order 09-3, until the Court receives for filing either a consent to the Magistrate Judge's jurisdiction or the reassignment of the case to a District Judge, the initial assignment of a civil case to the Magistrate Judge is a referral to the Magistrate Judge under 28 USC 636(b) for all pretrial non-dispositive matters and Report and Recommendations, but not for the Rule 16(b) scheduling conference. (Danieli, Chris)
April 27, 2021 Filing 5 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 4/23/2021 Case Number 1:21-cv-10683. (Danieli, Chris)
April 23, 2021 Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Kravitz, Jason)
April 23, 2021 Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Validity, Inc. (Baker, Casey)
April 23, 2021 Filing 2 Case transferred to Western Division (Springfield) (Baker, Casey)
April 23, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Profisee Group, Inc. Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8741640 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Validity, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Category Form, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Local Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement - Removed and refiled as a separate docket entry, see dkt. no. #3 )(Kravitz, Jason) Modified on 4/23/2021 (Baker, Casey).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Validity, Inc. v. Profisee Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Profisee Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Validity, Inc.
Represented By: Jason C. Kravitz
Represented By: Leslie E. Hartford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?