Rudolph and Me, Inc. v. Ornament Central, LLC et al Featured Case
Plaintiff: Rudolph and Me, Inc.
Defendant: Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges and Christine Casey
Case Number: 4:2011cv40168
Filed: September 12, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Worcester Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: F. Dennis Saylor
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2011 Filing 19 Case transferred in from District of Florida Middle via electronic case transfer; Case Number 8:11-cv-00670. File, transfer order and docket sheet received electronically. HMC
September 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 11 Defendants' Motion to Transfer to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Central Division. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/7/2011. (CR)
August 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER granting 16 Motion for Approval of Stipulated Extension of Time to Prepare and File Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/29/2011. (CR)
August 26, 2011 Filing 16 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file document CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT by All Plaintiffs. (Jenkins, Matthew)
August 26, 2011 Filing 15 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 (LS)
July 1, 2011 Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in opposition re 11 Motion to dismissMotion to change venue filed by Rudolph and Me, Inc.. (Jenkins, Matthew)
June 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting 12 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss or Alternatively Transfer Venue. Response due by 7/5/2011. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/22/2011. (CR)
June 20, 2011 Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply to DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY TRANSFER VENUE by Rudolph and Me, Inc.. (Jenkins, Matthew)
June 13, 2011 Filing 11 MOTION to dismiss Complaint Alternative, MOTION to change venue by Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Fee, Richard)
June 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER granting 8 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Complaint. Defendants' responses due 6/13/2011. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/7/2011. (CR)
June 6, 2011 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen M. Wade on behalf of Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges (Wade, Kathleen)
June 6, 2011 Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead re 1 Complaint by Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges. (Fee, Richard)
April 25, 2011 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed on 04/08/2011 by Rudolph and Me, Inc. as to Christine Casey. (Jenkins, Matthew)
April 25, 2011 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed on 04/08/2011 by Rudolph and Me, Inc. as to Smudges. (Jenkins, Matthew)
April 25, 2011 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed on 04/08/2011 by Rudolph and Me, Inc. as to Ornament Central, LLC. (Jenkins, Matthew)
April 1, 2011 Filing 4 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Exhibit A-C) (DMS)
April 1, 2011 Filing 3 Copyright Report sent to Washington. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Exhibit A-C) (DMS)
April 1, 2011 Filing 2 Summons issued as to Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges. (DMS)
March 30, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges with Jury Demand (Filing fee $350 receipt number TPA4353) filed by Rudolph and Me, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet) (DMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rudolph and Me, Inc. v. Ornament Central, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rudolph and Me, Inc.
Represented By: Matthew Richard Jenkins
Represented By: Peter J. Karol
Represented By: Lisa M. Tittemore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ornament Central, LLC
Represented By: Richard E. Fee
Represented By: Kathleen M. Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smudges
Represented By: Richard E. Fee
Represented By: Kathleen M. Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christine Casey
Represented By: Richard E. Fee
Represented By: Kathleen M. Wade
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?