Rudolph and Me, Inc. v. Ornament Central, LLC et al
Rudolph and Me, Inc. |
Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges and Christine Casey |
4:2011cv40168 |
September 12, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Worcester Office |
XX US, Outside State |
F. Dennis Saylor |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. § 101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 Case transferred in from District of Florida Middle via electronic case transfer; Case Number 8:11-cv-00670. File, transfer order and docket sheet received electronically. HMC |
Filing 18 ORDER granting 11 Defendants' Motion to Transfer to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Central Division. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/7/2011. (CR) |
Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER granting 16 Motion for Approval of Stipulated Extension of Time to Prepare and File Case Management Report. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/29/2011. (CR) |
Filing 16 Consent MOTION for extension of time to file document CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT by All Plaintiffs. (Jenkins, Matthew) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2 (LS) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in opposition re 11 Motion to dismissMotion to change venue filed by Rudolph and Me, Inc.. (Jenkins, Matthew) |
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER granting 12 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss or Alternatively Transfer Venue. Response due by 7/5/2011. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/22/2011. (CR) |
Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to file response/reply to DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS OR ALTERNATIVELY TRANSFER VENUE by Rudolph and Me, Inc.. (Jenkins, Matthew) |
Filing 11 MOTION to dismiss Complaint Alternative, MOTION to change venue by Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Fee, Richard) |
Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER granting 8 Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response to the Complaint. Defendants' responses due 6/13/2011. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 6/7/2011. (CR) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathleen M. Wade on behalf of Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges (Wade, Kathleen) |
Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for extension of time to file answer or otherwise plead re 1 Complaint by Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges. (Fee, Richard) |
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed on 04/08/2011 by Rudolph and Me, Inc. as to Christine Casey. (Jenkins, Matthew) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed on 04/08/2011 by Rudolph and Me, Inc. as to Smudges. (Jenkins, Matthew) |
Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed on 04/08/2011 by Rudolph and Me, Inc. as to Ornament Central, LLC. (Jenkins, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Trademark Report sent to Alexandria, VA. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Exhibit A-C) (DMS) |
Filing 3 Copyright Report sent to Washington. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint, # 2 Exhibit A-C) (DMS) |
Filing 2 Summons issued as to Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges. (DMS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Christine Casey, Ornament Central, LLC, Smudges with Jury Demand (Filing fee $350 receipt number TPA4353) filed by Rudolph and Me, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Civil Cover Sheet) (DMS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.