LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. LEE
| Luxottica Group S.p.A. |
| Young Kil Lee |
| 4:2021cv10934 |
| June 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Timothy S Hillman |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 District Judge Timothy S. Hillman: ORDER entered denying #10 Motion to Dismiss, without prejudice, subject to renewal, if appropriate, after completion of limited discovery. (Castles, Martin) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Luxottica Group S.p.A.. (Smith, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support re #10 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Young Kil Lee. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit by Ho Young Lee)(Walz, Eric) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss by Young Kil Lee.(Walz, Eric) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed Young Kil Lee served on 6/14/2021, answer due 7/6/2021. (Smith, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Young Kil Lee. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Burgos, Sandra) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. District Judge Timothy S. Hillman assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge David H. Hennessy. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Case transferred in from Eastern Division (Boston) on 6/4/2021 Case Number 1:21-cv-10934. (Alba, Robert) |
| Filing 5 Notice of correction to docket made by Court staff: The AO 120 Form and Exhibits (dkt. no. #3 ) and the Corporate Disclosure Statement (dkt. no. #4 ) were removed from dkt. no. #1 and refiled as separate entries. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING PATENT OR TRADEMARK. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 2 Case transferred to Central Division (Worcester). (Baker, Casey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against YOUNG KIL LEE Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number 0101-8805078 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Category Form, # 3 Exhibit Corporate Disclosure Statement, # 4 Exhibit Form A0 120, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit A to Form A0 120)(Smith, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: LUXOTTICA GROUP S.p.A. v. LEE | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Young Kil Lee | |
| Represented By: | Eric J. Walz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel N. Smith |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
