Osbeck v. Golfside Auto Sales, Incorporated
Plaintiff: Thomas Osbeck
Defendant: Golfside Auto Sales, Incorporated
Case Number: 1:2007cv14004
Filed: September 21, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Saginaw
Presiding Judge: Charles E Binder
Presiding Judge: Thomas L Ludington
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER granting 16 Motion to Set Aside DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND ORDERING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ON THE ISSUE OF PLAINTIFFS ACTUAL MONETARY LOSS. Signed by District Judge Paul D Borman. (DGoo)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osbeck v. Golfside Auto Sales, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Osbeck
Represented By: Adam G. Taub
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Golfside Auto Sales, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?