Klump v. Oglebay Norton Marine Services Company, LLC et al
| Randy Klump |
| Oglebay Norton Marine Services Company, LLC and Oglebay Norton Marine Management Company, LLC |
| 1:2008cv10120 |
| January 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Bay City Office |
| Presque Isle |
| Charles E Binder |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Marine |
| No cause code entered |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER granting in part and denying in part without prejudice 75 Motion in Limine and canceling motion hearing. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER denying 70 Motion to Consolidate Cases and Setting Trial Schedule. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Adopting In Part and Rejecting in Part the 46 Report and Recommendation, Sustaining Plaintiff's Objection, Sustaining in Part and Overruling in Part Defendant's Objections, Granting In Part and Denying in Part Defendant's 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and Referring Defendant's 30 Motion to Strike and Permitting the Parties to File Additional Dispositive Motions. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (CGre)
|
|
Filing
46
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defendants be GRANTED; and that 30 MOTION to Strike the Report of Roger L. Wabeke filed by defendants be Denied As MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles E Binder. (JBro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
