Porter v. Pandy et al
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Porter
Defendant: Prison Health Services, Incorporated, Patricia L Caruso, Jane/John Doe, Corrections Medical Services, Incorporated, Haresh B Pandy and Jeffrey C Stieve
Case Number: 1:2009cv13511
Filed: September 4, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Office: Bay City Office
County: Ionia
Presiding Judge: Ludington
Presiding Judge: Scheer
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: No cause code entered
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER granting 44 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot 57 Motion to Stay; denying as moot 59 Motion to Stay; adopting 61 Report and Recommendation ; denying as moot 63 Motion to Extend ; denying as moot 64 Motion for Sanctions; denying 67 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 26 Motion to Dismiss; granting 27 Motion for Summary Judgment; FURTHER that Plaintiff's complaint 1 is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (PMil)
August 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER Overruling 45 Plaintiff's Objections; adopting 34 Report and Recommendation and denying 23 Motion for TRO; denying 23 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge Thomas L Ludington. (SGam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Porter v. Pandy et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Prison Health Services, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Patricia L Caruso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane/John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corrections Medical Services, Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Haresh B Pandy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey C Stieve
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Porter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?