Cable et al v. Boyce Hydro Power, LLC et al
| Tyler Smith, John Surfus Rental Account, Incorporated, Whitney Cable, John D Surfus Enterprise, Incorporated and Nico Anthony Smith |
| Stephen B. Hultberg, WD Boyce Trust 3650, Boyce Hydro Power, LLC, Edenville Hydro Property, LLC, Boyce Michigan, LLC, WD Boyce Trust 3659, Michele Mueller, WD Boyce Trust 2350, Lee W. Mueller and Boyce Hydro, LLC |
| 1:2020cv11293 |
| May 22, 2020 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
| Thomas L Ludington |
| Patricia T Morris |
| Torts to Land |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT CLASS ACTION filed by Nico Anthony Smith, Tyler Smith, Whitney Cable, John D Surfus Enterprise, Incorporated, John Surfus Rental Account, Incorporated against Boyce Hydro Power, LLC, Boyce Hydro, LLC, Boyce Michigan, LLC, Edenville Hydro Property, LLC, Stephen B. Hultberg, Lee W. Mueller, Michele Mueller, WD Boyce Trust 2350, WD Boyce Trust 3650, WD Boyce Trust 3659 with Jury Demand. Plaintiff requests summons issued. Receipt No: AMIEDC-7819702 - Fee: $ 400. County of 1st Plaintiff: Midland - County Where Action Arose: Midland - County of 1st Defendant: Midland. [Previously dismissed case: No] [Possible companion case(s): U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, 2:20-cv-11288, Judge Thomas L. Ludington] (Bailey, Rebekah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
