Cruse v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
1:2020cv11632 |
July 10, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan |
Bay City Office |
Prisoner: Prison Conditions |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 ORDER Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 32 Report and Recommendation, Dismissing Defendant Ozukwe and Dismissing the 1 Complaint. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin) |
Filing 26 Opinion and Order Adopting the Magistrate Judge's 23 Report and Recommendation Recommendation and Dismissing the Complaint. Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin) |
Filing 5 OPINION and ORDER of Partial Summary Dismissal. (D Martin (Resident Unit Manager (RUM)), T. Massich (Assistant Deputy Warden (ADW)), T. McLean (Assistant Deputy Warden (ADW)), David Messer (Classification), Michigan Department of Corrections, Mor gan (Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor (ARUS)), John Rodriguez (SCC Committee), Szostak (Prison Counselor (PC)), Obell Winn (Warden, named as T. Winn), Zummer (Resident Unit Manager (RUM)), B. Evers (Assistant Deputy Warden (ADW)) and William Foy (Deputy Warden) Terminated.) Signed by District Judge Thomas L. Ludington. (KWin) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cruse v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.