Landis v. Cardoza et al
Case Number: 2:2005cv74013
Filed: October 19, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: John Feikens
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 153 OPINION and ORDER denying 144 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law or, in the Alternative, for a New Trial. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (SJa)
February 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 127 Opinion and ORDER granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 113 Motion in Limine; granting in part and denying in part 125 Motion in Limine. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER denying 114 Motion for Jury Questionnaires. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 120 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion to Quash. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)
December 14, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER denying 73 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by District Judge Stephen J Murphy, III. (AGre)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Michigan Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Landis v. Cardoza et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?